On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 at 10:21, Marco Pivetta <ocram...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I kept my "NO" stance here, as per discussion in > https://externals.io/message/110004#110005, where I provided (in my > opinion) good/safe alternatives to arrays as input parameters. > For the record, I maintain my reaction from https://externals.io/message/110004#110010 that the example you give "cheats" by including a "fromArray" method which simply emulates named parameters, but without any assistance from the language would require a large amount of boiler-plate to do so. Would you be more open to a version of the feature that was opt-in at the definition site? Then your example could swap the hand-rolled documentation and validation in "fromArray" for a fully typed signature in "fromNamedParams", and the only compatibility promises would be ones already made by "fromArray" anyway. Regards, -- Rowan Tommins [IMSoP]
