> > > > Again, I personally don't understand why this could bypass the RFC > > process, as multiple people have already, me included, voiced their > > disagreement with this change. > > > > This was proposed by Nikita Popov in his comment > > > > Nikita is just one of the members. If other members want an RFC, we need > it. > > Also, the PR has a couple of :-1: votes as well, which indicates that an > RFC is necessary. >
Just for clarity, Nikita didn't propose such thing that the feature can skip the RFC process. The exact words he used is the following: This does not necessarily need an RFC, but needs a discussion on the > mailing list at least, as the reception here seems somewhat negative. Default target version is > 8.1 now, though exceptions can be made for small features. All this means is: - The discussion on the ML is a must - IPHP 8.1 is the default target Regards: Máté
