On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 at 12:18 am, Benjamin Morel <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 at 01:06, Derick Rethans <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 21 June 2021 23:37:56 BST, Yasuo Ohgaki <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >The name "is_trusted" is misleading. >> >Literal is nothing but literal. >> >> I agree with this. The name is_trusted is going to be the same naming >> mistake as "safe mode" was. Developers will put their trust in it that it >> is 100% guaranteed safe. > > > FWIW, agreed, too. Trusted is vague and may imply some false sense of > security. Literal is literally what it says on the tin. > I can follow up properly tomorrow, but by popular request we do support integers as well (could be seen as stretching the definition of “literal” a bit). And we did ask for suggestions last week, which ended up with a vote (as I couldn’t decide). That said, I’m really glad that the only issue we seem to have is the name. Craig
