On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 12:51 PM Max Kellermann <max+...@blarg.de> wrote:
> On 2023/02/13 10:28, Dmitry Stogov <dmitrysto...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It's OK when commits are reverted. > > You are working in a common repository, and if your commits become > stoppers > > for others they have to be reverted. > > Some of my commits were reverted as well. > > That doesn't explain why you demanded to revert everything instead of > applying my trivial single-line fix. > > > Having too many dependent commits and inability to revert a single one > > became an additional trouble and drew more attention to things you are > > doing... > > I didn't care about a single header change, but I do care about 100 > > dependent commits. > > I don't get it, what's your point here? > > The fact that these dependencies exist is a result of the unclean > state of the PHP code base, something my work aims to improve. The > number of dependencies after my PRs was lower than before, and that's > good. > > The "inability to revert a single one" is not a problem that needed to > be solved, because a revert was never necessary - there was a trivial > fix (that did work, contrary to your assertion). > > > After all, this includes cleanup is really questionable, and the current > > vote result shows that is not my sole opinion. > > Personally, I think this work might be very welcome during PHP-7.0 > > development together with other re-factoring(s). > > Massive permutation changes in a minor release are not acceptable for me. > > Maybe it makes sense to target them to PHP-9.0 > > The vote is not about WHEN this cleanup can be done - it's about > WHETHER at all. > > Voting "yes" does not imply that this must be done for 8.3. The RFC > suggests that it could be 8.3 or 9.0, but that decision is not part of > the vote. > > Voting "no" means you never want this cleanup to happen, ever, not for > 8.3 and not for 9.0. > > So if you're not really opposed to such a kind of cleanup in general, > don't vote "no". > The RFC proposes merging into the "master" branch. And I voted exactly against this. Thanks. Dmitry.