On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 9:05 PM Christoph M. Becker <cmbecke...@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 16.12.2024 at 14:18, Jakub Zelenka wrote: > > There was a suggestion of RFC but that might be a bit too much as it's > just > > an internal change / addition. But certainly some overview on internals > > should be done so writing this instead. > > I'm fine with not going through the RFC process, although the policy[1] > police might come after us. :) > > I think it fits to all inclusion criteria and doesn't go against any exclusion. Maybe except that "de facto standard" but for our use there was really no other option as I mentioned in my comparison so it was the only library left for our needs if there is only one, then it's "de facto standard" we could say. Btw. It was probably mistake to set that policy for C code because we don't really need to care if PHP recommends any tool there - I completely missed it when voting for it. This should be just for PHP application that we care about. We should modify that policy accordingly - I need to make a list of changes that to the policies as there are quite a few points. Regards, Jakub
