Hi

On 2/18/25 18:31, Rob Landers wrote:
You may be interested in a super-draft RFC that I’ll propose in the next few 
days…

May I kindly request some breathing room with regard to new RFC discussions so that folks are able to give each RFC the proper attention. The list currently is super active. We have:

- 2 Votes in progress (FCC in constexpr, aviz for static)
- 6 discussions with RFC written (NoDiscard, get_error_handler, URI, Compression, Optional Interfaces, Pipe) - and several non-RFC or pre-RFC discussions (Async, Constructor Overloading, Not Null Assertions, …)

This is already approximately 3 RFC discussions too many. Perhaps wait until Mid-March or so? I expect at least some of the currently discussed RFCs to be in voting by then.

Best regards
Tim Düsterhus

Reply via email to