On Tue, Feb 18, 2025, at 20:24, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > Hi > > On 2/18/25 18:31, Rob Landers wrote: > > You may be interested in a super-draft RFC that I’ll propose in the next > > few days… > > May I kindly request some breathing room with regard to new RFC > discussions so that folks are able to give each RFC the proper > attention. The list currently is super active. We have: > > - 2 Votes in progress (FCC in constexpr, aviz for static) > - 6 discussions with RFC written (NoDiscard, get_error_handler, URI, > Compression, Optional Interfaces, Pipe) > - and several non-RFC or pre-RFC discussions (Async, Constructor > Overloading, Not Null Assertions, …) > > This is already approximately 3 RFC discussions too many. Perhaps wait > until Mid-March or so? I expect at least some of the currently discussed > RFCs to be in voting by then. > > Best regards > Tim Düsterhus >
Hi Tim, I assume you are speaking to me, personally? This will be opened as a draft before proposing it to the list, which will indeed (probably) be around mid-March, pending solicited feedback, so no worries. I also have a couple drafts/in-discussion to close that this new RFC will supersede. — Rob
