On 19 August 2025 14:14:07 BST, Jakub Zelenka <bu...@php.net> wrote: >On Sun, Aug 17, 2025 at 4:42 PM Tim Düsterhus <t...@bastelstu.be> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I just opened the vote for the "'Abstain' voting option for RFCs" policy >> RFC: >> >> RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/rfc_vote_abstain >> Discussion: https://news-web.php.net/php.internals/128185 >> PR: https://news-web.php.net/php.internals/128185 >> >> As with every RFC, a 2/3 majority is required. Voting ends 2025-08-31 at >> 15:00:00 UTC. >> >> The vote already includes the “Abstain” option to dogfood the RFC and to >> showcase how the voting widget will look like should the RFC be >> accepted. Although it could be argued that selecting the “Abstain” >> option would be a vote in favor of having such an option, it will be >> considered an abstention. Please vote “Yes” if you are in favor of the >> RFC :-) >> >> >I don't have issue with this. The only minor cosmetic thing is that it >makes the table wider so it will more often not fit to the mobile screen >and will need horizontal scroll. I think the solution for that could be to >remove that user name in brackets that just repeats the linked name - e.g >bukka (bukka). That would be nice to do as part of the "implementation" for >this... :) > >Regards > >Jakub
It's the long commit hash in the table that makes it wide in this case. But I can have a look at getting rid of the duplication (regardless of whether the RFC passes) cheers Derick
