Hi all

Am 19.08.25 um 14:47 schrieb Tim Düsterhus:
> Hi
>
> Am 2025-08-19 14:06, schrieb Andreas Heigl:
>> And as the RFC does not mention any possible future additions/
>> modifications regarding quorum
>
> The RFC literally mentions “Quorum” as a “possible future modification”
> by listing “Introducing a quorum” in the “Future Scope” section. So I
> don't quite follow.
I explicitly looked for that and seem to indeed have overlooked it!

Thank you, Tim!

In that case I stand corrected and - as already mentioned - changed my vote!

Regards

Andreas
--
                                                              ,,,
                                                             (o o)
+---------------------------------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo-+
| Andreas Heigl                                                       |
| mailto:andr...@heigl.org                  N 50°22'59.5" E 08°23'58" |
| https://andreas.heigl.org                                           |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| https://hei.gl/appointmentwithandreas                               |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| GPG-Key: https://hei.gl/keyandreasheiglorg                          |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to