Regarding the group, I want to once again express an important point. The main problem, the primary blocking issue, is that nobody believes this RFC has any real chance.
It’s like in the banking system: if you convince people that stocks will fall, then even if it’s not true, the stocks will fall. At the same time, I agree with this assessment. We are facing a paradox. To make changes to the language, you need to believe that these changes can be accepted. Previously, there were doubts about whether such changes could even be implemented. That problem has been solved. What remains is the lack of trust in acceptance. How can this be resolved? I think there are ways, and they are known. They are just all outside the scope of the current RFC. ---- Ed
