On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 21:52:28 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ilia Alshanetsky) wrote:
^ > Pierre first of all I put the change in after a discussion with Derick > and a number of the while you were present btw. This was done to > declare the date class for "future" proofing and allow isolation of > date constants into a class, as is done for all new OO extensions. You cannot trust Derick about ext/date, sorry. He did not respect our decisions since he started to work on the TZ support and force anyone to use the new implementation in 5.1.x. I never agreed to anything Derick did in 5.x but was forced to shut up and let him put some stupid object inside a #ifdef, as far as this crap was in a #ifdef, yes I would have said, fine, we have time until php6. > I'll pretend that by "crappy" you mean limited, which it is because > all the methods are disabled till 5.1.1 when we will enable them to > allow a extensive test cycle. It is crap, I need one hour to do it and I doubt Derick has any good plan about a real new Date object API in php But this is _not_ the problem, and you know that. --Pierre -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
