Phil,
Based on past experience in dealing with primary testers we usually
only get responses when things go bad, as such waiting for positive
responses until rolling the final is not practical in my opinion. I
think the best I can propose is that we give testers at least one
week to try the final RC and if we don't hear any complaints assume
all is well.
On 18-May-06, at 3:20 AM, Phil Driscoll wrote:
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 17:59, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
Let's keep this number of lists to the minimum. Thanks to Lukas, we
already have a wiki with all this information, lets keep using it,
the release process is complex enough already without having to
scramble around looking for information on dozens of websites.
Sure - I said that is would be sensible for the list to be on
Lukas's wiki
when I first suggested it, but it's hard to demonstrate an idea in
a location
you don't have write access to :)
Ilia, if you and Derick are happy to work with a primary testers
list in the
way I suggested, let me know and I'll liaise with Lukas to get
everything
needed up on the Wiki, and try and recruit testers for the various
applications and platforms.
--
Phil Driscoll
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Ilia Alshanetsky
Advanced Internet Designs Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
