Pierre wrote: > On 6/19/07, Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> But this is no different from writing code that will work on both PHP 5 >> and PHP 6. The only difference is that instead of checking for PHP 5 >> you will be checking for Unicode. Like I said, we don't want the >> Unicode decision to be synonymous with PHP 5 vs. PHP 6 because then the >> non-Unicode folks will never get the benefits of the non-Unicode >> improvements in PHP 6 and we would be forced to support PHP 5 for a lot >> longer. We really stretch our already thing resources in order to >> support multiple branches, so anything we can do to get as many people >> as possible onto the same codebase helps us a lot. > > Just as a last (hopefully) comment, even if nothing seemed to have an > influence, no matter how many we are to prefer a unicode only mode (so > far only you are in favour of it, maybe Andree too but I don't > remember his opinion on this topic :).
Uh, this was agreed upon by everyone involved in the design of the Unicode support. So saying I am the only one is extremely misleading. I may be the only one explaining why the decision was reached, but I am certainly not the only one in favour of it. > The gain we hope to have by keeping a non unicode mode is about having > more users moving to PHP6. I would like to know why it will work > better than with php5, any thoughts? By not providing it, we ensure that a large number of people will not move to PHP 6. At least by providing it we give ourselves a chance. I think if we drop it we are basically giving up and we will be maintaining 2 code bases for the next 10 years. Do we really want that? > And let forget that maintaining (and develop/implement) these two > modes will obviously take more time. More time than maintaining separate Unicode and non-Unicode code bases in difference branches? -Rasmus -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
