On 13/12/2007, Jani Taskinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 14:36 +0100, Jochem Maas wrote: > > I would hazard to say that php is becoming a victim of it's own success in > > this regard - to really tackle the issue would probably require the > > implementation > > of a more structured proposal/implementation/release process ... I will > > grant that > > that is a mammoth task to undertake! > > We already have that, it's called "Feature/Change request" category in > bugs.php.net (which is of course ignored by everyone :)
Oh. Really? I just added a useful one to fix the stupid way non optional params are returned as False. Sure it is how it has always been, but talk about counter-intuitive! -t[-+] is the proposal by the way with -t- being the default as that is what is currently done. Wouldn't break backwards as -+ are not allowed in a param name. -- ----- Richard Quadling Zend Certified Engineer : http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=213474731 "Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!" -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
