> Anyway, do we really have to tell people "you don't need it" when they > believe that they do? > Python has multithreading and it works reasonably good. People who know > what they are doing can implement really brilliant solutions (think Tornado) > > Interesting thing here threads would require (at least if they are implemented the way C, etc. threads usually work) whole new protocol of synchronization too. Just think about something: do you have shared classes/variables/etc.? Eve Online in Stackless Python fmspy.org with stackless python etc.
> And something like GIL feels like a reasonable compromise to me. > I think PHP is the last from the major scripting languages on the market without some kind of thread support. (Cannot find a good comparsion, but Ruby, Python, Perl does some) Tyrael
