On Oct 24 15:41:44, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> >class Bar {
> > // override getFoo() to add some specific behaviour
> > public function getFoo() {
> > // do the specific stuff
> > parent::getFoo();
> > }
> >}
>
> I think you meant Bar to extend ActiveRecord? But anyway, I think
> that this particular call should be done through __call, not
> __callStatic, since it's basically non-static call. The line between
> the two wasn't really well-defined in PHP (you could call static
> methods non-statically and vice versa) which is a pity but I think
> distinction can be made in this case.
Exactly, if Bar::getFoo is not called statically, parent::getFoo() will
not be a static call, it should not get through __callStatic.
Best,
>
> --
> Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
> SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
> (408)454-6900 ext. 227
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
--
Etienne Kneuss
http://www.colder.ch
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
