In my opinion (as a person with 0 karma), I think that sounds reasonable
because most people are most concerned about the actual implementation
(syntax, performance, apc etc) because I don't think many argue that
Metadata doesn't have value.
What are the 5 different discussion topics you are thinking of, just out
of curiosity?
Also, I can just post my syntax idea as a gist or pastie or something
instead of making an rfc...
-Alec
On 11/16/2010 9:29 PM, guilhermebla...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Stas,
Ok, so you think I should just consider everyone want some sort of
meta attribute support and start discussing the topics?
Should I separate it in different threads or put it all here?
The subject is big and I identify at least 5 different discussions
that can diverge.
Cheers,
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Stas Malyshev<smalys...@sugarcrm.com> wrote:
Hi!
I'm able to write 10 RFC's, but none will care until we reach this
list with a patch.
Not entirely true. Patch helps, but with feature this big and complex having
consensus on design before actually implementing it may be better and save
you some time.
As for polls, I think generic "having annotations" poll is not very useful.
It's like having a poll "should we have cool features in PHP?" Of course we
should! The devil is in the details. And so far the details of this thing
contain a significant number of devils we have to handle.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
