On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Philip Olson <phi...@roshambo.org> wrote:
>> I'd to say that I'm very happy to finally see such discussions >> happening, let sort the base (99% is done by our existing RFC about >> release process, let adopt it already!) and move on with 5.4. > > > This is a prime example of what we're talking about. Several have expressed a > desire to follow an Ubuntu style of branching instead of the style proposed > in said RFC. This is a core issue, so the RFC is certainly not ready to adopt. > > So does this require a new RFC, or do the RFC proposers feel this is a key > concept? As I stated before, there is a RFC with a fair amount of developers involved. Some of the supporters of the Ubuntu TLS model already changed their mind (as it clearly does not work for php, random features being TLS just because of the timing makes no sense). If you think a RFC is not ready, not desired, not good enough or whatever other reason motivates you, vote against and propose something else. But you can even say no and propose nothing afterwards. As of this specific RFC, it is actually a very good one, it is not perfect and will need adjustement in the coming years, that's a damned sure thing. But we can not argue forever only because a minority thinks we should argue endlessly or change nothing. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
