Martin Scotta
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Anthony Ferrara <ircmax...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > No default values, other then NULL allowed.
> > Otherwise we would need to support array("classname", "methodname")
> > too, and then people would want default array values for array
> > typehinting etc etc etc.
>
> Unless I mis-read what you said, we already have default array values
> for array type-hinting:
>
> function foo(array $array = array('bar', 'baz')) {
> var_dump($array);
> }
>
> foo();
>
> foo(array());
>
> Works perfectly for me on 5.3.6...
>
it works since long time ago
>
> 2011/6/8 Hannes Magnusson <hannes.magnus...@gmail.com>:
> > 2011/6/8 Johannes Schlüter <johan...@schlueters.de>:
> >> On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 12:12 -0700, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> >>> Hi!
> >>>
> >>> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/callable
> >>>
> >>> It is good there's an RFC. However it seems to lack code examples. I
> >>> understand it may be obvious to the proposers how it looks like, but
> >>> it'd be nice to have the actual example there as it is done nearly
> >>> everywhere else.
> >>
> >> The RFC is missing information about what happens in codebases which
> >> already have a "callable" type declared. Will that be prevented or will
> >> they hit a runtime error? ("callable expected, callable type found")
> >
> > You mean an interface/class with that name?
> > The error would be 'expected instanceof callable, string/array/closure
> recieved.
> >
> > gettype("strpos") will still return a string, not callable.
> >
> > A callable wouldn't be fully featured type.
> >
> >> What about default values? Will
> >> function foo(callback $cb = 'strpos') { }
> >> be valid?
> >
> > No default values, other then NULL allowed.
> > Otherwise we would need to support array("classname", "methodname")
> > too, and then people would want default array values for array
> > typehinting etc etc etc.
> >
> >
> >
> >> The information on reflection is limited. what shall
> >> Reflection::Parameter::getTypehint() return? Will that method allow to
> >> differ between a class type and this "magic"?
> >
> > There is no such method anymore :)
> >
> >
> >>
> >> What about ARGINFO? Will internal functions be able to define this type
> >> via ARGINFO? How will this be reported in `php --rf function`?
> >
> > I didn't include arginfo in the patch, but good point. It should
> > probably be included.
> > As Felipe pointed out, ext/reflection hasn't been updated.
> > It should return [ callable $foobar ], just like with any other typehint
> >
> > -Hannes
> >
> > --
> > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >
> >
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
