Good idea. I will see what I can do when I get time. ~Hannes
On 3 August 2011 12:32, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote: > hi Hannes, > > I would suggest to still update the RFC with the various very > instructive comments and example use cases you use in this thread. > Doing the same in the long run should help as well to understand the > goals, implementations, etc., for the pecl users or for the 2nd > attempt to get it in the core, if still desired. > > Cheers, > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Hannes Landeholm <landeh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> We had a healthy discussion around WR and I have been able to express >> my concerns. The consensus is clearly to put it in a PECL extension so >> I think this discussion should move on to the practical matters of >> doing this. I suggest aborting the vote and changing the RFC state to >> something like "Transfered to PECL". >> >> ~Hannes >> >> -- >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> >> > > > > -- > Pierre > > @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
