hi Justin, I'm totally for that, has been asked it for years.
Let see what other nicer status we need as wel :) Cheers, On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Justin Martin <frozenf...@php.net> wrote: > Hello, > > With some frequency, I find bugs which are not "bogus", so much as they are > reported based on a misunderstanding. Usually this happens for documentation > problems, where someone has misunderstood what the documentation says, or > hasn't read the documentation thoroughly enough. > > I'd like to propose simply changing the term "bogus" to "not-bug". This > would more politely and clearly indicate the nature of the way the bug is > being closed, in addition to the comment that one ordinarily leaves. > > Those I've spoken to in php.doc agree. Any objections? > > Thank you, > Justin Martin > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
