On Jan 24, 2012, at 3:47 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Justin Martin <frozenf...@php.net> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> With some frequency, I find bugs which are not "bogus", so much as they >> are reported based on a misunderstanding. Usually this happens for >> documentation problems, where someone has misunderstood what the >> documentation says, or hasn't read the documentation thoroughly enough. >> >> I'd like to propose simply changing the term "bogus" to "not-bug". This >> would more politely and clearly indicate the nature of the way the bug is >> being closed, in addition to the comment that one ordinarily leaves. >> >> Those I've spoken to in php.doc agree. Any objections? >> >> Thank you, >> Justin Martin >> >> > > +1 on this. > some other alternatives which was proposed in the past: > - Not a bug, proposed by Philip and others > - NFF/No Fault Found, proposed by RQuadling > > honorable mentions: > - pebkac, doofus, and 'not our problem' from yawk > - SEP (Someone else's problem) from cjones >
583: CNR (Could Not Reproduce) -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
