hi Tom, For one, it is mapped to the libcurl constants and behavior.
Also this but report contains clear comment about this issue being a documentation problem, contribution welcome :) If you consider it as something that should be changed, then please feel free to add a comment there as well, or a patch :) But that's not really what we discuss here but the new code proposed by Pierrick. Cheers, On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Tom Boutell <t...@punkave.com> wrote: > I'd sure like a PHP extension that didn't have this obvious and nasty bug: > > https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=46439 > > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com>wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> >> I wanted to make this new version available in PHP5.4 but >>> unfortunately I did finish my work when it was already in RC phase. >>> The question now is should we include this new version in PHP5.4.1 or >>> should we wait for PHP 5.5/6/7 or whatever PHP next will be. There is >>> no feature break (AFAIK) so all the previous code should work as >>> expected. You'll find the list of new features attached and the last >>> code in the trunk branch. >>> >> >> Can't you make it also available as pecl extension, which could be built >> on 5.4? This way people could enjoy the benefits of your work without >> stable branch being disrupted and BC problems raised. >> >> -- >> Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect >> SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ >> (408)454-6900 ext. 227 >> >> >> -- >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> >> > > > -- > Tom Boutell > P'unk Avenue > 215 755 1330 > punkave.com > window.punkave.com -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
