I thought about it but I think it may confuse people to have two different extensions with the same name, same interface, but one in pecl and one in the core package (the difference between the 2 versions are not that big). Also as ilia mentioned if someone already have the original version, they will have symbol conflicts. So I guess we could just wait until PHP next unless someone have an other nice solution which will not confuse people :)
Thanks all for your input. Pierrick On 11 March 2012 03:33, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com> wrote: > Hi! > > >> I wanted to make this new version available in PHP5.4 but >> unfortunately I did finish my work when it was already in RC phase. >> The question now is should we include this new version in PHP5.4.1 or >> should we wait for PHP 5.5/6/7 or whatever PHP next will be. There is >> no feature break (AFAIK) so all the previous code should work as >> expected. You'll find the list of new features attached and the last >> code in the trunk branch. > > > Can't you make it also available as pecl extension, which could be built on > 5.4? This way people could enjoy the benefits of your work without stable > branch being disrupted and BC problems raised. > > -- > Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect > SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ > (408)454-6900 ext. 227 -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
