On 23.04.2012 18:06, Johannes Schlüter wrote: > On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 16:47 +0200, Jordi Boggiano wrote: >> As you see it goes from no version at all to proper versions, passing by >> svn revisions, dates, or a mix of all. >> >> In Composer [1] we try to parse all that using ReflectionExtension, to >> allow people to require some specific version of an extension if they >> want. Obviously this doesn't work very well when no version or some >> random revision number is provided. >> >> Is there any other way I overlooked to get more version info? If not, >> can this at least be improved in the future? > > For PECL extensions the version number should be fine (or you can hit > the package maintainer ;-) ). For core stuff i'd propose to switch to > PHP_VERSION as version everywhere. While this can be complicated for > extensions which are maintained in both (oci8 for instance)
That sounds reasonable, but is it possible that someone does this for all core ext (if it's not done yet, sorry I don't follow the commits list)? Then I'll happily nag pecl maintainers if I find offenders :) BTW I checked all the core exts I have on my machine, and none of them has a version above 5, so changing them all to 5.4.2 should not mess up any >=X.Y.Z constraint. Cheers -- Jordi Boggiano @seldaek - http://nelm.io/jordi -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
