Hey all, After reading the Voting Periods email thread, I'm left wondering a simple question (which has a difficult answer):
What should we be voting on when voting on an RFC: on the RFC proposed feature, or on the patch itself? I've always approached it as we're voting for the concept (and details) provided in the RFC. But it appears that other people have been voting on the specifics of the attached patch (so theoretically an RFC could be rejected entirely because some people don't like part of the implementation in C, but are fine with the PHP details). I'll leave out my opinion (and justification) for now, I'm curious what you all think... Thoughts? Anthony
