On Feb 19, 2013, at 8:00 AM, Sara Golemon <poll...@php.net> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Kingsquare.nl - Robin Speekenbrink
> <ro...@kingsquare.nl> wrote:
>> Just a question from one of the lingering listeners: would this change also
>> ease the `skipping` of default values for parameters? (as discussed for RFC
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/skipparams)
>> 
>> That way it would be consistent with this RFC and the list() construct ?
>> 
> It's orthogonal to skipparams.  It'd neither help nor hurt based on
> the recommendations of that RFC.
> 
> With regard to list(), it already supports expressions like this:
> list($x,) = array(123); so nothing more needs to be done for it and
> it's not at odds with either of these RFCs.

I would vote +1 on this solely for the sake of consistency.  I've never liked 
the idea behind the parser's actions on constructs (list, array).

> 
> -Sara
> 
> -- 
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> 


--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to