On 27 בפבר 2013, at 18:58, Anthony Ferrara <ircmax...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Zeev et al, > > I just want to put my justification for the "only if no delay" vote. I voted > that way because we're already at a significant delay. If this vote was a > month ago when O+ was suggested first, I would definitely have voted for > "delay". In fact IIRC I proposed a delay back then. But after a month, I > think delaying much further would be imprudent. > Fair enough! Here's mine for delaying: I believe our users will much appreciate a release with an opcode cache that's several months delayed vs. one that's without an opcode cache several months early. If the 5.4 adoption rate (or complete lack thereof) is any indication - very few are eagerly waiting for 5.5. In fact, in a year's time, when we all gear up to release 5.6 (based on current frequency) - 5.5 is almost guaranteed to have next to no traction in our userbase. A bundled opcode cache might be the killer feature that makes the difference. FWIW I think we should actually reconsider even striving for a yearly release cycle, but that's another story... Zeev -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
