On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> I am not sure whether this is a little overhead.
>>
>> but if we do want this. to be honest, I even prefer leave it empty to
>> "default".
>>
>> like create_query("delete=0", "name", , , true);
>
> That's how it was initially, and I was convinced default is better. So I
> don't think I'm going back to empty. default indeed seems to be more
> readable (try to visually distinguish between ,,,, and ,,,, - if you
> have a lot of code, it won't be that easy). It is more verbose, but PHP
> never attempted to be "save the bytes" language.
> --
> Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
> SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
> (408)454-6900 ext. 227
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
Hi,
For me as a user it would make much more sense to have named
parameters then typing default. Default also feels a bit strange to
type. What if I miss one default in the line? Or in the other proposal
here, what if I miss one comma?
Named parameters would also solve a problem from another RFC that's
being proposed right now if I understand correctly so why not go for
that?
Kind regards
----
Florin Patan
https://github.com/dlsniper
http://www.linkedin.com/in/florinpatan
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
