On Jul 11, 2014 7:01 PM, "Andrea Faulds" <a...@ajf.me> wrote: > > > On 11 Jul 2014, at 17:54, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > And now I wonder why you even bother to propose it if you are going to > > push it anyway with phpng. This is not really a good way to push > > things, and as phpng is getting bigger and bigger nobody has a clue > > about what has been done and a vote will only be biased to begin with, > > based only on given performance results. It can't end well. > > Myself, I will be voting for phpng not for performance, but because I find the internal API to be saner.
If more inconsistencies are saner, then yes. If more cryptic macros are saner then yes. Etc.