On Jul 11, 2014 7:01 PM, "Andrea Faulds" <a...@ajf.me> wrote:
>
>
> On 11 Jul 2014, at 17:54, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > And now I wonder why you even bother to propose it if you are going to
> > push it anyway with phpng. This is not really a good way to push
> > things, and as phpng is getting bigger and bigger nobody has a clue
> > about what has been done and a vote will only be biased to begin with,
> > based only on given performance results. It can't end well.
>
> Myself, I will be voting for phpng not for performance, but because I
find the internal API to be saner.

If more inconsistencies are saner, then yes. If more cryptic macros are
saner then yes. Etc.

Reply via email to