On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Andrea Faulds <a...@ajf.me> wrote:

> On 23 Jul 2014, at 15:21, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I also think that it would be reasonable to have two weeks for the votes
> to
> > come in, as https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting states that "There'd be a
> > minimum of 2 weeks between when an RFC that touches the language is
> brought
> > up on this list and when it's voted on is required." and while the code
> > impact for this rfc is really small (modifying the version numbers), but
> it
> > is an important decision for the project and for the language.
> > sorry if it feels being too bureaucratic
> That refers to the minimum time for discussion, I don’t think we need 2
> weeks for a vote. In a week’s time when the vote would end, if it looks
> like not enough people have voted, I suppose it could be extended.

argh, you I right, the relevant part is "The voting has minimal period of 1
week, which can be extended when circumstances warrant it.", so one week is
fine by the rules.

Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu

Reply via email to