On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Andrea Faulds <a...@ajf.me> wrote: > > On 23 Jul 2014, at 15:21, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I also think that it would be reasonable to have two weeks for the votes > to > > come in, as https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting states that "There'd be a > > minimum of 2 weeks between when an RFC that touches the language is > brought > > up on this list and when it's voted on is required." and while the code > > impact for this rfc is really small (modifying the version numbers), but > it > > is an important decision for the project and for the language. > > sorry if it feels being too bureaucratic > > That refers to the minimum time for discussion, I don’t think we need 2 > weeks for a vote. In a week’s time when the vote would end, if it looks > like not enough people have voted, I suppose it could be extended.
argh, you I right, the relevant part is "The voting has minimal period of 1 week, which can be extended when circumstances warrant it.", so one week is fine by the rules. -- Ferenc Kovács @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
