On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Andrea Faulds <a...@ajf.me> wrote: > > > > > On 23 Jul 2014, at 15:21, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I also think that it would be reasonable to have two weeks for the > votes > > to > > > come in, as https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting states that "There'd be a > > > minimum of 2 weeks between when an RFC that touches the language is > > brought > > > up on this list and when it's voted on is required." and while the code > > > impact for this rfc is really small (modifying the version numbers), > but > > it > > > is an important decision for the project and for the language. > > > sorry if it feels being too bureaucratic > > > > That refers to the minimum time for discussion, I don’t think we need 2 > > weeks for a vote. In a week’s time when the vote would end, if it looks > > like not enough people have voted, I suppose it could be extended. > > > argh, you I right, the relevant part is "The voting has minimal period of 1 > week, which can be extended when circumstances warrant it.", so one week is > fine by the rules. > > -- > Ferenc Kovács > @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu > Wow, looks like the PHP 7 votes are dominating so far. If you want to avoid the confusion and ridicule that will result from skipping a version increment, I suggest you remember to cast your vote. Editorial aside, I'm glad that the two sides were able to come together and get this to a vote finally. --Kris
