On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Rowan Collins <rowan.coll...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ferenc Kovacs wrote (on 13/08/2014): > >> >> It is not selecting the first default, it just never needs to look >> for a default, because it has already found a matching case label. >> >> >> yes, and it continues the execution from the first matching case and >> correctly evaluates the following defaults, as default matches everything, >> which imo should be the correct behavior. >> > > No, it does not "evaluate the following defaults"; it evaluates all > following code. Once a label has been selected, you can think of all > subsequent labels being removed from the code completely. > > duh, that was embarrassing, thanks for bearing with me until I realized that. :S -- Ferenc Kovács @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
