done.

Dmitry.


On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:50 AM, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com>
wrote:

> Hi!
>
> > array of registered resources of particular type. See patch:
> >
> > https://gist.github.com/dstogov/f96c04f5979e726909ab
>
> It would be better as a pull, it's be easier to comment on it.
> For the function get_resources, the proto says it has no arguments, but
> it actually has one S argument that is not documented. Could you add a
> proto for it?
>
> > I'm not sure if such small change needs RFC.
>
> I don't think so, seems to be pretty non-controversial.
> --
> Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
> SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
>

Reply via email to