On 28/01/15 19:19, Michael Wallner wrote: >> Also, we're planning to move extensions from core to pecl, for example >> > ext/mysql which I is still widely used by many applications, despite its >> > known shortcomings. TBH, I don't see many reasons why a pecl extension >> > should be moved to core.
> So that basically means, there shouldn't be any extension added to the > core any more, or only PECL ones? Bundling more and more into core is a pointless exercise. If pecl_http is any good then it will gain it's own traction in distribution space as just another package that can be added. Unbundling and better management of interoperability is starting to see some more support and management of extensions in their own code space is going to make life a lot easier in the long term! -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
