Hi Andrey, On 28/01/2015 23:50, Andrey Andreev wrote:
You're voting "no" because the FIG can't agree yet? They've been discussing this for *at least* an year and iirc the first PSR-7 coordinator gave up on it because he no longer believed in the end result. What does that tell us?
That some actual work is finally being done now. Whether or not you, I or everyone else likes the direction it is going.
I'm not saying that you should vote "yes", but it's one thing to look at the FIG for opinions/suggestions/inspiration and completely different if you imply that they should dictate how a PHP core extension is implemented.
Indeed. But I am aware that an effort to have common Request/Response interfaces is under way and I'd like to see how that goes (opinions/suggestions/inspiration) before marrying to a specific, possibly incompatible, implementation (pecl_http in core).
PHP-FIG is not an authority and I too am quite annoyed by the excessive usage of the word "standard" when referring to a "PSR". They are not standards, they are recommendations written by a self-appointed group of people and mostly for their own usage. A group of mostly very smart people indeed, and important figures in the PHP community too, but not an authority.
Sure, "S" in PSR stands for Starndard, but "R" means Recommendation, but this is going slightly OT.
Cheers -- Matteo Beccati Development & Consulting - http://www.beccati.com/ -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
