On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Leigh <lei...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 10 February 2015 at 23:29, Paul Dragoonis <dragoo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It's common sense that if something receives significant resistance then > > there's usually a good reason for it and it shouldn't be ignored > regardless > > of how mathematically accurate it may seem to exclude it. Let's keep > MSSQL > > in. > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/removal_of_dead_sapis_and_exts#extmssql > > Where is the significant resistance? >
The original email said "17:13" i.e: I guess the mail was wrong then.
