Hi!
>> function foo($a)
>> require($a >= 0)
>> {
>> }
>
> This is a step better but still we have the similar issues with
> readability, to which reuse of 'require' is added.
Just a thought - what about something like __pre/__post? We own __*, so
no BC problems.
OTOH, don't our new parsing improvements allow us to handle syntax like
this without introducing a keyword that would be forbidden as
class/function name? The context is pretty unambiguous here.
--
Stas Malyshev
smalys...@gmail.com
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
