2015-02-18 22:22 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Stogov <dmi...@zend.com>:

> I think the AST API shouldn't use "public" properties.
> Using it, we will have to construct the whole tree of objects, duplicating
> information from AST.
> I would propose SimpleXML approach instead - construct object only for
> node(s) we currently access.


What about Generators? They can be used nicely for handling AST data. And
each node can be constructed as needed during the traversal. Probably this
way is better than ArrayAccess

Reply via email to