Francois and Lester (and all), Please keep this thread on-topic. It should be for technical discussions around this RFC only. If you have something non-technical to discuss, please start a new topic.
Thanks Anthony On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:58 AM, François Laupretre <franc...@php.net> wrote: >> De : Lester Caine [mailto:les...@lsces.co.uk] >> >> On 19/02/15 04:44, Dennis Birkholz wrote: >> > I just saw the reddit where you mention that v0.4 is practically >> > abandoned now, so I will just renounce my previous mail! >> >> DO NOT USE OTHER CHANNELS! > > Agreed. > > And the RFC was not abandoned at all. I and others have been working almost > continuously on a 'compromise' single-mode approach during the last 3 days > (and nights), as activity on the list shows with no doubt. So, pretending > the RFC to be 'abandoned' is just a way to discard a disagreed work. > > As long as she does not officially gives up (posting to the list), I'll keep > considering Sara still has the lead on scalar type hinting. If she officially > gives up, I'll immediately propose to take it over and, if we are several to > want it, we'll discuss. > > That's the rule and I encourage list members to explicitly show their support > to the formal process we all agreed upon. > > For the rest, Lester summarized quite well my view about designing PHP for > static analysis, instead of static analysis for PHP ;) > > Regards > > François > > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
