Benoit ... actually Anthony's original proposal specifically was designed to be live at the same time as this alternative proposal. And it's even mentioned in the proposal (stating that it would stay open until the 13th or when the alternative proposal voting ended - whichever was later)
So this was all 'as planned' there, Eli On 3/11/15 2:37 PM, Benoit Schildnecht wrote: > Hi, > > You are making a very huge mistake, IMHO. By having 2 conflicting RFC, > you are taking the risk they both fail. And it won't do any good to the > language. > > While you could have either proposed yours after the STH one if it > would have failed, or create a new RFC to make the STH one evolve > if it would have succeeded, you decided to act with precipitation. > Why did you do this ? > > I'm kinda sad, upset and anxious. > > Regards, > > > "Zeev Suraski" a écrit dans le message de groupe de discussion : >> The vote on the Coercive Scalar Type Hints is now open for voting. > >> The latest version of the RFC includes changes discussed on >> internals@ last > week: > >> 1. Accept string->bool and int->bool conversions (false->bool is not > supported) > >> 2. Accept leading/trailing spaces in string->number conversions. > > > > wiki.php.net/rfc/coercive_sth > > wiki.php.net/rfc/coercive_sth#vote > > > > Thanks! > > > > Zeev > -- | Eli White | http://eliw.com/ | Twitter: EliW |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
