On 19 May 2015 at 17:16, Levi Morrison <le...@php.net> wrote: > I strongly disagree with this action. These types required an RFC; why > should this be different? Also note that neither of the reserve > typename RFC were unanimous. > > Furthermore, we are past the RFC stage. We are *supposed to already > have an alpha* by now and we are proposing new changes?. Please stick > to our established rules and release timetables as much as possible, > thank you. >
To be fair, this change does not change a single byte of code. It's just adding another type to the "reserved" list (to be documented) in the manual. Unless I'm mistaken. If the above really is the case, then why not stick up an RFC and vote.? P.S. I'm not 100% clear on the outcome of all of these votes on what is "reserved" and whether any of those give warnings/etc. in PHP 7; maybe someone could give me an executive summary off-list? :) > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >
