As alluded to in an earlier email today[1] I am now moving the
Nullable Types RFC[2] to the discussion phase. In a nutshell this RFC
proposes syntax for declaring a type to alternatively be null.

There is a decision that needs to be made: does the question mark go
before or after the type name?

    function (?Foo $foo);
    function (Foo? $foo);

There are precedents in several languages for each position. Some
relevant issues to where the question mark goes are noted in the
RFC[3].

I look forward to a helpful and meaningful discussion!

  [1]: http://news.php.net/php.internals/92252
  [2]: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/nullable_types
  [3]: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/nullable_types#position_of

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to