> it's just that no one except you thinks this is a good solution it's just that no one - who is allowed to vote and wants to vote - thinks this is a good solution.
Regards Thomas Rasmus Schultz wrote on 07.08.2016 13:06: > Looks like it's unanimously a No. > > Michael, don't be discouraged - I think that everyone agrees that there is > a problem to be solved, it's just that no one except you thinks this is a > good solution; many of us are of the opinion that it's not a solution that > really addresses the problem at all: you haven't eliminated the choice of > whether or how to escape something, you've merely changed the scope of that > choice - into global state, which clearly isn't popular. > > I encourage you to keep thinking about this problem, but you should explore > entirely different directions - rethink and rephrase the problem, get to > the core of it, and a different angle on the problem might reveal itself. > > > On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Michael Vostrikov < > michael.vostri...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello. The RFC 'New operator (short tag) for context-dependent escaping' is >> now in voting phase. >> >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/escaping_operator >> >> This RFC introduces new short tag/operator, which will perform echo with an >> automatic call of escaping function. >> Voting is open till August 6, but it can be prolongated if you will decide >> that this is too small voting time for such a change. >> Voting requires 2/3 support. >> >> Thank you for voting. >> > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
