@Fleshgrinder thanks, my knowledge of C allowed me to implement some features experimentally. When problem occurs then I'll find any needed help because I think this feature is needed. Personally I don't have wiki karma so help in writing RFC if you have karma could help us very much.
2016-08-08 19:16 GMT+02:00 Silvio Marijić <marijic.sil...@gmail.com>: > @Fleshgrinder, Thanks, every help is welcome. > > 2016-08-08 18:44 GMT+02:00 Fleshgrinder <p...@fleshgrinder.com>: > >> On 8/8/2016 5:00 PM, Silvio Marijić wrote: >> > It's great that you are up of this. >> > I think it will be great to see this one in action. >> > >> > I agree that we should separate them into separate RFC-s. >> > >> > 2016-08-08 15:51 GMT+02:00 Michał Brzuchalski <mic...@brzuchalski.com>: >> > >> >> It is great to hear somone is interested so why not. My lately >> discussion >> >> found usefull implementing 3 keywords, such as: >> >> 1. *immutable* for the functionality you are currently working on. >> >> 2. *sealed* for the above plus type not changeable. >> >> 3. *final* for the above plus not being overridable. >> >> >> >> But all of them should be implemented in different RFC's starting from >> >> Immutable because it's base point to toher two keywords. >> >> Whole idea needs refreshing discussion to clarify idea so it can >> success. >> >> >> >> I would like to offer my support. I might not be as familiar as you guys >> with the C source but if you need anything (e.g. documentation, RFC >> writing, testing, ...) let me know. >> >> -- >> Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger >> >> > > > -- > Silvio Marijić > Software Engineer > 2e Systems > -- pozdrawiam -- Michał Brzuchalski
