On Thu, 25 Jan 2018, Ryan Pallas wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 7:52 AM, Derick Rethans <der...@php.net> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 24 Jan 2018, Michael Morris wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, here's another idea I've been mulling over. This I know is possible
> > > because I've done it using user land code, specifically Drupal 8's
> > > Assertion\Inspector class.
> > >
> > > https://api.drupal.org/api/drupal/core%21lib%21Drupal%
> > 21Component%21Assertion%21Inspector.php/class/Inspector/8.5.x
> > >
> > > These methods provide a means to inspect collections - arrays usually but
> > > also Traversables. They fill a hole in the PHP library - the ability to
> > > check collection integrity.
> >
> > IMO, it makes a lot more sense to check integrity when creating the
> > "array" structure. Instead, I would suggest to add a native Collection
> > type, that takes a "type" as argument. They aren't quite full generics,
> > but it does 1. fix something; 2. isn't really complicated.
> >
> > What I am suggesting is to add a new syntax "Collection<$type>",
> > mimicking a class, but having a type as "argument":
> >
> >
> Just like to point out if it's considered a class, or takes the same space
> there is likely collisions. While most collection classes on github look to
> be in a namespace, there are lots that aren't. Of course github only gives
> us a view of open source projects that happen to be on github.

PHP owns the top-level namespace. It has always done that. It's even 
documented: http://docs.php.net/manual/en/userlandnaming.rules.php

cheers,
Derick

-- 
https://derickrethans.nl | https://xdebug.org | https://dram.io
Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: https://xdebug.org/donate.php,
or become my Patron: https://www.patreon.com/derickr
twitter: @derickr and @xdebug

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to