On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:15 AM Anatol Belski <a...@php.net> wrote:

> Hi Sara,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sara Golemon <poll...@php.net>
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 5:20 PM
> > To: Dmitry Stogov <dmi...@zend.com>
> > Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
> > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] FFI - Foreign Function Interface
> >
> > I'm not super enthused by having "ffi.enable=true" even be an option, to
> be
> > quite honest.  For CLI, sure but the damage that can be wrought from a
> web
> > server exposed to the internet is non-trivial.  And I'm also going to
> let my
> > prejudice show: I don't trust someone who doesn't know how to write an
> > extension in C to use FFI.  Heck, I've seen some extensions that make me
> > wince pretty hard, but at least there I feel like they've had to do
> something
> > more thoughtful than copy-paste an example from stack overflow and
> > change a name or two without any concern for how an unmanaged language
> > works.
> >
> IMO ffi.enable=true by default is ok. Clearly there's a concern about the
> web server usage. However, to give a parallel, there's a lot modules like
> numpy in Python using ctypes and ffi and they're usable with say Django. It
> is all a consideration of stability and QA. Developing a module with ffi
> will likely require a C debugger to be at hand :) If someone copy-paste ffi
> code into their production without an appropriate QA, well - there's
> probably no method that could be ever invented to protect against such
> practice. One can actually tell same about pure PHP code, that is used
> without appropriate testing. Otherwise, given there were established
> modules based on FFI, that are installed a responsible way, having more
> hurdles than needed were probably a surplus. Hosting providers and other
> parties would be able to figure best secure ways to handle this for their
> customers anyway.
>
> Regards
>
> Anatol
>

My feeling has always been that we shouldn't keep powerful features from
good developers because other developers might create poor applications/use
it incorrectly.
-- 
-- Chase
chasepee...@gmail.com

Reply via email to