On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 11:45 AM Jan Schneider <j...@horde.org> wrote:
> > Zitat von Bishop Bettini <bis...@php.net>: > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 7:27 PM Stanislav Malyshev <smalys...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi! > >> > >> > Anyhow, this is water under the bridge now, and I think we should > issue > >> > a call for maintainership[4] for ext/imap as soon as possible, since > >> > this is not the only issue[5] of this unmaintained[6] extension. > >> > >> Pierre is listed as maintainer. But given that he is for deprecating it, > >> I guess we try to find somebody who is willing to revive it (not likely) > >> and failing that (likely) go the deprecation route probably... Given how > >> many references to it I see on github though, it's not the best outcome. > >> > > > > I'd like to take this one, too. > > > > RoundCube may roll its own, but I know the popular Horde IMP uses this > > extensively. > > Horde isn't using ext/imap since ages, but has developed a PHP-only > IMAP library long ago, that's being used by many other OSS projects too. > I appreciate the clarification, Jan, thanks. I must have been reading the h3 docs, instead of current. o.O The library is indeed very nice, https://github.com/horde/Imap_Client/ Looks like it's faster than native ext/imap, too https://dev.horde.org/imap_client/ One recent SO answer comparing ext/imap and Horde Imap_Client: https://stackoverflow.com/q/6659409/2908724 Given the high quality userland option(s) out there, it seems a waste of effort to revitalize the extension with a fresh imap implementation. We should be fixing the bugs though, and I'll focus on that. For now let's just call it actively maintained, but feature frozen? bishop
