possibly unrelated, random news, privacy related URL distributed today
about eu commission and the eu data protection act
http://iccheshireonline.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0200businessfarmingnews/tm_objectid=14663715&method=full&siteid=50061&headline=raid-threats-to-city-firms-name_page.html

there is also an issue with regard to what it means to "sign" .... digital
signatures as in authentication .... can hardware tokens, portals, etc.
.... "signing" as part of some type of three factor authentication:

* something you know
* something you have
* something you are

if a portal produces a digital signature, then a relying party might imfer
that there was some form of "something you know" authentication since the
portal might be designed to only perform a digital signature when provided
with some form of password.

if a hardware token produces a digital signature, then a relying party
might possibly infer both "something you know" and "something you have"
authentication ... assuming that a person holds the hardware token and the
hardware token requires a pin or password to operate

authentication definitions would, in no way, preclude portals performing
digital signatures .... since it all comes down to is what a relying party
may infer when they encounter a digital signature.

problems could crop up though if people were to confuse such digital
signatures with legal signatures (as opposed to being able to just infer
some form of authentication).

in the crypto mailing list there was an extended discussion about
infrastructure vulnerability when the same key pairs might be used for both
authentication events as well as in conjunction with legal signature
operations:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm17.htm#57 dual-use digital signature
vulnerability
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm17.htm#59 dual-use digital signature
vulnerability
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm18.htm#0 dual-use digital signature
vulnerability
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm18.htm#1 dual-use digital signature
vulnerability
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm18.htm#2 dual-use digital signature
vulnerability
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm18.htm#3 dual-use digital signature
vulnerability
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm18.htm#4 dual-use digital signature
vulnerability
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm18.htm#6 dual-use digital signature
vulnerability
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm18.htm#12 dual-use digital signature
vulnerability
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm18.htm#13 dual-use digital signature
vulnerability
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm18.htm#17 should you trust CAs? (Re:
dual-use digital signature vulnerability)

semi-related to x9.99 privacy standard being passed (and should show up at
the ansi e-store shortly) and the new privacy work item being approved for
iso tc68 ... i also recently got an email notice that iso sc6 has approved
a new work item for the finread terminal

there was a related discussion in the sci.crypt newsgroup regarding some of
the requirements for legal signature (with some relationship to
feature/function in finread terminal, but happened to wander around and
cover a somewhat broader range of characteristics):
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004h.html#48 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004h.html#50 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004h.html#51 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004h.html#52 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004h.html#53 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004h.html#54 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004h.html#55 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004h.html#56 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004h.html#57 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004h.html#58 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004h.html#59 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004i.html#2 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004i.html#4 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004i.html#5 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004i.html#6 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004i.html#7 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004i.html#9 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004i.html#10 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004i.html#11 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004i.html#12 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004i.html#13 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004i.html#14 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004i.html#15 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004i.html#16 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Ceritificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004i.html#17 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004i.html#18 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004i.html#19 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004i.html#20 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004i.html#21 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004i.html#22 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004i.html#23 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004i.html#24 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004i.html#25 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004i.html#27 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004j.html#0 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004j.html#1 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004j.html#3 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004j.html#6 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004j.html#7 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004j.html#8 New Method for Authenticated
Public Key Exchange without Digital Certificates


--
Internet trivia, 20th anv: http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm

Reply via email to