__________________________________________________

Call for Papers

Theme: The Ambiguous Semantics of 'Reeducation' in Transnational and
Transhistorical Perspective
Type: International Conference
Institution: Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU)
   Amerikahaus Munich
Location: Munich (Germany)
Date: 16.–18.2.2022
Deadline: 1.9.2021

__________________________________________________


The international conference entitled The Ambiguous Semantics of
“Reeducation” in Transnational and Transhistorical Perspective takes
as its point of departure an examination of US-American reeducation
policies in Germany and Japan after World War II from a comparative
and transnational perspective. Organized by an interdisciplinary
research consortium at FAU Erlangen-Nuernberg, it aims to broaden the
focus beyond this specific geographical constellation and beyond the
period of the immediate postwar. What does “reeducation” entail in
different cultural and historical scenarios? Can we conceive of
“critical reeducation studies” as an interdisciplinary field of
study? What would such a field look like?

Accordingly, this conference is an occasion to problematize and
discuss the concept of “reeducation” in a broader sense including a
rigorous investigation of power differentials and a nuanced analysis
of intercultural encounters in occupied territories as well as in
colonial and postcolonial settings. “Reeducation,” viewed in this
light, describes various, at times incommensurable, ideas, norms, and
practices. The latter can include strategies of democratization,
emancipation, and empowerment but also involve, more often than not,
different forms of violence (both physical and epistemic) and the use
of force in occupation settings in order to control an indigenous
population. Hence, the ambiguous and changing semantics of
“reeducation” will have to be discussed as they appear in different
functional areas of society – as part of political communication, as
mass media phenomena, as institutional creeds, and as programmatic
rhetoric appropriated by different actors and groups in civil society
and military and para-military institutions. Studying “reeducation”
can shed light on multidirectional influences and ramifications as
well as point to the overt or more subtle paradoxes that the
prescribed or voluntarily enacted (un)learning processes may entail.
The focus on processes indicates that “reeducation” in its different
shapes and guises is itself often both a vehicle and a product of
transitions.

We invite contributions to the conference which address the topics
and guiding questions of one of the three suggested panels:

- Panel 1: Colonization and Reeducation

This panel examines reeducation strategies in a diachronic
perspective: it seeks to address the (often dark) pedagogy of
“reeducation” (“top-down”) as part of agendas of colonization. This
includes forms of internal colonization as well as measures taken in
the context of territorial annexation and occupation by European,
Asian, or US-American Empires. As a second aim, this panel has as an
objective the validation of resistance to hegemonic regimes of
(un)learning in these colonial or quasi-colonial scenarios (“bottom-
up”), which range from manifestations of “colonial mimicry” (Bhabha)
to open insurgence.

- Panel 2: The Global Entanglements of Post-World War II “Reeducation”

This panel zooms in on the post-war as a particularly prominent
moment of “reeducation” which can be identified on an almost global
scale. The so-called allied occupation of Europe and East Asia after
World War II produces very different settings in which “reeducation”
can mean all of the following: punishment and punitive measures,
societal reform, gender emancipation, the abolition of hierarchies as
well as the erection of (new) hierarchies or the re-introduction of
old ones, depending on the region and the occupational policy. Next
to Germany and Japan, attention will be on other European and Asian
countries, such as Italy and Korea.

- Panel 3: “Reeducation” in Contemporary Postcolonial and
  Post-Conflict Settings

The aim of the final panel is to apply the framework of “comparative
reeducation studies” to more contemporary sites and scenarios. The
term “reeducation” has prominently re-emerged, for instance, in US
policies concerning Afghanistan and Iraq (often also prompting
comparison with post-war Germany and its ‘successful’
democratization) but it also appears in less optimistically inclined
articulations of neo-colonial violence and control – and is used as
thinly veiled propaganda. Today, as in previous decades and periods,
the term “reeducation” cannot be severed from its complicity with
specific ideologies and power structures. For this and other reasons,
it calls for historical context and synchronic comparative work.

To apply, please send short proposals (500 words max.) and a one-page
CV to jana.are...@fau.de no later than September 1, 2021. Successful
applicants will be notified by October 1, 2021.

The conference is organized by the FAU research consortium:
Jana Aresin, Katharina Gerund, Akino Oshiro, Heike Paul and Fabian
Schäfer (FAU Erlangen-Nuernberg)

For more information, see the project website:
https://www.reeducation.phil.fau.de





__________________________________________________


InterPhil List Administration:
https://interphil.polylog.org

InterPhil List Archive:
https://www.mail-archive.com/interphil@list.polylog.org/

__________________________________________________

Reply via email to